A synthetic image of CRT TV sets in a living room setting, glowing in nostalgic vintage hues

AI Scribes in Healthcare: What U.S. Patients Need to Know and Act On

 A synthetic image of CRT TV sets in a living room setting, glowing in nostalgic vintage hues

[May 31, 2025] — Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to transform healthcare, and one notable advance is the rise of ambient AI scribes. These tools capture and transcribe clinical conversations as they occur, producing draft notes for electronic health records (EHRs). By reducing administrative burdens, AI scribes aim to let physicians focus on patient care rather than documentation.

Note: This guidance is specific to healthcare settings in the United States. If you are outside the U.S., please refer to local regulations regarding medical record privacy and patient rights.

 

Understanding Ambient AI Scribes

Ambient AI scribes rely on in-room microphones—often small, puck-shaped devices—to record clinician–patient dialogue (Greene, 2025). The audio is sent to a secure cloud-based model that generates draft notes, which clinicians then review and finalize. Health systems such as Kaiser Permanente report improvements in documentation efficiency and patient satisfaction when using these tools (Greene, 2025).

However, AI scribes are not infallible. Fischer and Gebauer (2025) found that forty-two percent of AI-generated draft notes still contained factual or medication errors after clinician review. In addition, data security remains a concern: in 2024, eighty-eight percent of patient record breaches in the U.S. were attributed to hacking incidents (PrivaPlan Associates, 2025).


Potential Concerns

  • Accuracy of Transcriptions: AI-generated notes may omit or misinterpret critical details, which can affect diagnoses or treatment plans (Fischer & Gebauer, 2025).
  • Data Security and Privacy: Recorded conversations become part of a cloud network. A breach could expose sensitive medical data (PrivaPlan Associates, 2025).
  • Patient Consent: Under U.S. law, patients must be informed when third-party vendors record their encounters (45 CFR §164.502(e)).
  • Evolving Legal Landscape: Pending state and federal legislation could introduce inconsistent or conflicting AI requirements, potentially undermining existing safeguards. Proposals for both stricter transparency rules and moratoriums on state-level AI laws illustrate a fragmented approach that may create uncertainty and risk (Kiplinger Editors, 2025; The Guardian, 2025).

Two High-Impact Actions You Can Take Now

While a full toolkit requires deeper engagement, these two steps can immediately enhance control and awareness:

  • Ask About AI Scribe Use at Check-In
    Before an appointment, inquire:
    • “Are you using any AI scribe or speech-to-text service today? If so, which vendor and how is my data protected?”

Under HIPAA, the clinic must answer truthfully, as any external transcription vendor is considered a business associate (45 CFR §164.502(e)). Knowing this up front sets clear expectations and helps you decide whether to proceed.

  1. Review Your Visit Note Within 48 Hours
    After the appointment, log into the patient portal and read the draft note carefully. If anything appears incorrect, request an amendment under HIPAA’s right to amendment (45 CFR §164.526). Even this single check can prevent misunderstandings or potential risks.

 

What This Means

AI scribes promise efficiency and the potential for more focused patient–clinician interaction. Yet they also introduce new responsibilities: patients must remain vigilant about how their information is captured and documented. By asking about AI use during check-in and reviewing notes promptly, patients can assert control over their health record.

 

Key Takeaways

Ambient AI scribes represent a meaningful advance in U.S. healthcare documentation. Two immediate actions—clarifying AI use at check-in and reviewing notes within 48 hours—can significantly enhance both accuracy and privacy. As AI continues to evolve, staying informed and taking prompt steps will ensure that patients benefit from innovation while safeguarding personal health information.

 

Sources & References
Chase Clinical Documentation. (2024). HIPAA compliance in AI-powered medical scribing. Retrieved from
https://www.chaseclinicaldocumentation.com/hipaa-compliance-in-ai-powered-medical-scribing
Fischer, S. H., & Gebauer, S. L. (2025, April 4). Are AI-Generated Medical Notes Really Any Worse? RAND Corporation. Retrieved from
https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/04/are-ai-generated-medical-notes-really-any-worse.html (RAND Corporation)
Greene, J. (2025, March 26). Quality assurance informs large-scale use of ambient AI clinical documentation. Permanente Medicine. Retrieved from
https://permanente.org/quality-assurance-informs-large-scale-use-of-ambient-ai-clinical-documentation/
Kiplinger Editors. (2025, May 26). Will state laws hurt AI’s future? Kiplinger. Retrieved from
https://www.kiplinger.com/politics/how-will-state-laws-hurt-future-of-ai
PrivaPlan Associates. (2025, May 20). AI ambient scribes: Is your health care clinic ready? Retrieved from
https://privaplan.com/ai-ambient-scribes-is-your-health-care-clinic-ready
The Guardian. (2025, May 14). Republicans propose prohibiting U.S. states from regulating AI for ten years. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/14/republican-budget-bill-ai-laws
Tali AI. (2003, Sept 7). Ambient scribe: The future of healthcare documentation. Retrieved from
https://tali.ai/resources/ambient-scribe-the-future-of-healthcare-documentation

Disclaimer
This article offers educational insights on ambient AI documentation in U.S. healthcare settings. It does not constitute medical, legal, or financial advice. For guidance tailored to an individual situation or for more in-depth support regarding AI documentation best practices, please contact Ashlock Consulting.
Back to blog