Beyond the Buzz: Rethinking AI and Blockchain Education for the Black Diaspora
By Lucky Star, Responsible AI | Blockchain Educator & Consultant
The Current Landscape of AI and Blockchain Education
[May 3, 2025] — In recent years, there's been a notable increase in AI and blockchain education programs targeting Black communities in Africa and the Americas. While these initiatives are often presented as efforts to bridge the digital divide, it's essential to scrutinize their underlying objectives.
Some observers note that these programs often focus more on growth metrics and audience reach than on supporting meaningful, long-term participation. This approach can mirror historical patterns of resource exploitation, raising concerns about the true beneficiaries of such educational efforts (Iyer, 2022).
Challenges in Access and Outreach
Despite the growth of AI and blockchain education programs, many Black communities, especially in areas with fewer resources, still face challenges in accessing these opportunities. Limited infrastructure and financial constraints often reduce the ability to engage fully.
In the United States, recent budget proposals have included substantial reductions to programs designed to support equitable access to education for students in areas with fewer resources. These cuts may have a disproportionate impact on students from economically neglected backgrounds, including those facing economic challenges or disabilities, potentially deepening existing gaps in educational access (Modan, 2025; Henderson, 2025).
Furthermore, as AI tools are increasingly integrated into classrooms, there are concerns about the reinforcement of existing imbalances. Experts caution that without appropriate oversight, these technologies could contribute to the perpetuation of long-standing inequalities, especially for Black students (Williams, 2024).
The Importance of Equitable AI and Blockchain Education
Equitable access to AI and blockchain education is not merely about fair participation and involvement; it is about ensuring that Black communities can actively contribute to shaping the technologies that significantly affect their lives. Without this access, there is a risk of reinforcing existing imbalances and overlooking substantive perspectives that can drive meaningful innovation.
Initiatives such as the Black AI Consortium work to address these gaps by fostering dialogue and collaboration within the African diaspora. These efforts emphasize the potential for community-driven approaches to technology education that prioritize agency over data extraction.
Oversaturation in Some Regions, Absence in Others
In major urban areas across Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, Brazil, and certain U.S. cities, AI and blockchain bootcamps, summits, and training programs are often viewed as pathways to advancement. However, outreach to rural areas, historically underfunded communities, or regions that have been politically neglected—particularly within the U.S.—is often absent or inconsistent (Nglia, 2022).
This absence does not reflect a lack of interest or potential. Instead, it reveals a pattern of selection based more on market demand than human development. The imbalance is further exacerbated when access is contingent upon visible cultural engagement or branding before entry is allowed.
Access at Scale vs. Access with Purpose
Many education campaigns are structured on the assumption that participants are ready to consume and contribute. However, in areas lacking broadband infrastructure, foundational knowledge of blockchain, or a cultural connection to AI ethics frameworks, "education" can often feel more like pressure than empowerment. When programs prioritize adoption metrics over fostering curiosity, consent, and sustainable growth, their outcomes tend to be short-term and fragile (Snow, 2025).
In the United States, this issue is compounded by continuous cuts to public resources. As funding to libraries, community centers, and youth services declines, those who would benefit most from non-extractive tech education face increasing barriers to access (USA Today, 2025). Meanwhile, decisions about AI ethics, biometric data, and automated systems proceed without their involvement.
What We Risk Losing
If this trend continues, future generations may be positioned not as innovators or contributors but as passive data sources and early testers. Without frameworks that emphasize informed consent and accessible learning, the decisions being made today in Web3(Blockchain) and AI governance will lack the valuable insights of those who are most familiar with real-world adaptability and ingenuity.
We risk losing more than untapped talent—we risk losing cultural strategies, ethical considerations, and alternative worldviews that could help reshape how global technology develops (UNESCO, 2021; United Nations, 2023). The forms of expression that have long been carried through oral, communal, and embodied knowledge systems must not be sidelined in favor of systems that only reward linear, object-based production (Lucky Star, 2024).
A Way Forward
The solution is not more campaigns but better communication and deeper listening.
Those creating tools and policies can:
- Map real gaps before launching new outreach.
- Fund community-informed design rather than top-down approaches.
- Translate materials into accessible language and formats.
- Invest in long-term partnerships, not one-off summits.
- Prioritize informed consent and open dialogue, especially around biometrics, surveillance technology, and AI integration.
Everyday people can:
- Stay informed through accessible outlets.
- Join or form local groups focused on tech and ethics.
- Call for transparency and human-centered design in their workplaces or educational environments.
-
Share knowledge—across generations, communities, and locations.
Regardless of institutional decisions, individual awareness remains crucial. When approached collectively, responsibly, and with care, it can help redirect systems in a more equitable direction.
Sources & References
Black girls as creators in the field of AI. (2023). Arizona State University. Retrieved from https://education.asu.edu/faculty-and-research/projects-and-impact/black-girls-creators-field-ai
Dvorak, P. (2024, February 19). We now have to pass laws to protect freedoms we thought we had. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/19/maryland-bill-book-challenges-libraries/
Henderson, E. (2025, February 5). Trump’s Education Cuts: Impact on Red States, People of Color, and Underserved Communities. LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/trumps-education-cuts-impact-red-states-people-color-henderson-kiu6c
Iyer, N. (2022, August 15). Digital Extractivism in Africa Mirrors Colonial Practices. Stanford HAI. Retrieved from https://hai.stanford.edu/news/neema-iyer-digital-extractivism-africa-mirrors-colonial-practices
Lucky Star. (2025, May 2). The cost of constraining expression: Why abstraction should not be a privilege. Retrieved from https://luckystar.ai/blogs/personal/the-cost-of-constraining-expression-why-abstraction-should-not-be-a-privilege
Modan, N. (2025, May 2). Trump’s FY26 budget would slash more than $4.5B from K-12. K-12 Dive. Retrieved from https://www.k12dive.com/news/trump-white-house-fy-2026-budget-proposal-cuts-grants-title-I-IDEA/747057/
Ngila, F. (2022, June 23). Africa is joining the global AI revolution. Quartz Africa. Retrieved from https://qz.com/africa/2180864/africa-does-not-want-to-be-left-behind-in-the-ai-revolution
Snow, J. (2025, March 10). Are you AI literate? Schools and jobs are insisting on it—and now it’s EU law. Fast Company.Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/91276048/ai-literacy-schools-and-workforce
UNESCO. (2021, November 25). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
United Nations. (2023). Mind the AI divide. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/digital-emerging-technologies/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/MindtheAIDivide.pdf
USA Today. (2025, April 3). Libraries are under siege: How Trump's cuts put community hubs in peril. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/04/03/libraries-trump-federal-funding-cuts/82598580007/
Williams, J. (2024, February 13). AI in Schools: Revolution or Risk for Black Students? Word In Black. Retrieved from https://wordinblack.com/2024/02/ai-schools-revolution-risk-black-students/